The information has been released and reveals that: The ALAEA conducted a Freedom of Information (FOI) exercise to establish what happened. We noticed that the AMO did not amend their advice. CASA is amending the AC to more accurately reflect the content and intent of the MOS to avoid any misinterpretation.ĬASA advised us that the AMO had been contacted over the matter. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) has reviewed Advisory Circular (AC) 66-08 further and accepts that paragraphs 3.4.2.1 and 3.5.3.2 should not imply or express that a B1 licence holder has privileges for maintenance of any mechanical aspects of a system where Table 1 to paragraph 66.A.20 of the Part 66 Manual of Standards (MOS) is designated B2. The ALAEA and members disagreed with the advice and requested a CASA review. Earlier this year we became aware that an AMO had told their B1 LAMEs that they could certify for ‘any mechanical aspects’ of ATA Chapter systems designated B2.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |